On 11/3/20 4:22 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
So the value being passed between client and server over the
protocol may look like `<sid1>/<sid2>/<sid3>` rather than just a
single `<sid_x>` term. For your purposes, do you want or care if
you get the single term or the full SID ?
I'm not sure we care too much one way or the other. A single component
of the SID should be enough to join client & server logs, but it's
easier to just send the whole thing.
It may be worth documenting this design decision in the protocol
doc; even though protocol doc may say this should be treated as an
opaque token, people may assume certain structure.
good point. let me make a note to revisit that text.
thanks
Jeff
