"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> > You said "squashing", but I'd suggest keeping it as its own patch on top
>> > of Bradley's.
>>
>> OK, let's do so.
>>
>> I recall I read that Bradley's patch needs a bit of word/grammo
>> polishing?
>
> Well, I pointed out a missing article ("a") in the line *above*
> Bradley's change in two man pages. It's a minor nit, and it's
> unrelated to his proposed change. I have no opinion about whether
> it's better to do it separately from his change or as a separate
> commit.
Thanks for reminding me. In any case, an updated version that ended
up being a 3-patch series is now on the table. I think they are in
good shape to be merged down.
Thanks.
