Re: [PATCH 0/1] Clarify and expand description of --signoff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 12:53:56PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >> What should we change there? We could perhaps bring up signoffs earlier
> >> or more prominently. Or tie it in to the git-commit docs by saying
> >> explicitly: these are _our_ project rules for signoffs.
> 
> Let's tie this loose end.  How about squashing in something like
> this?

Thanks for writing this up. I agree it makes the text much better (not
only in emphasizing the point we've been discussing, but also in general
clarity).

You said "squashing", but I'd suggest keeping it as its own patch on top
of Bradley's.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux