Re: [PATCH 0/1] Clarify and expand description of --signoff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 12:53:56PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >
>> >> What should we change there? We could perhaps bring up signoffs earlier
>> >> or more prominently. Or tie it in to the git-commit docs by saying
>> >> explicitly: these are _our_ project rules for signoffs.
>> 
>> Let's tie this loose end.  How about squashing in something like
>> this?
>
> Thanks for writing this up. I agree it makes the text much better (not
> only in emphasizing the point we've been discussing, but also in general
> clarity).
>
> You said "squashing", but I'd suggest keeping it as its own patch on top
> of Bradley's.

OK, let's do so.

I recall I read that Bradley's patch needs a bit of word/grammo
polishing?

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux