On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 11:13:43AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > As the other person in the discussion, I'm sufficiently convinced that > > doing this just for PRs is a good step for now. I.e., I think the > > "completed form" is just what was posted already (though I agree it is > > often convenient to the maintainer to re-post the patch as part of the > > ping). > > Yes, and CC'ing those who were involved in the review would give > them the last chance to say "oh, no, that extra change you added > for this final submission was not something I meant to suggest!", > etc. > > So, is <pull.709.git.1600759684548.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> as-is the > one we should take? AFAIK it's the only one on the list. :) So yes, that one is fine with me. -Peff
