Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020, Chris Webster wrote:
>
>> Is this waiting for some action on my part? I thought the question of
>> running on push vs pull had been resolved (in favour of pull).
>
> FWIW I agree that the current shape is the best we can do for now (and of
> course, full disclosure: I was the one suggesting to restrict this to Pull
> Requests because we know exactly the commit range to check in that case).
I think this is exactly the use case that
After the list reached a consensus that it is a good idea to apply the
patch, re-send it with "To:" set to the maintainer{current-maintainer}
and "cc:" the list{git-ml} for inclusion.
in Documentation/SubmittingPatches was written to address.
I usually pay attention to majority of topics and have them on my
radar by getting involved in _some_ way in the discussion thread, so
I often know when the patch(es) matured enough to be picked up
without such a "this is the version after our discussion and it is
as close to perfect as we can possibly make" resend.
But for some topics, I have no strong opinion on the exact shape of
the final patch(es), and/or I have no expertise to offer to help the
discussion to reach the final product. In such a case, I'd be just
waiting, without getting involved in the discussion, for trusted
others to bring the posted patch to a completed form. I think this
is such a case.
Thanks.
