Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > This series grew directly out of suggestions proposed in [1]. Its > purpose is twofold. First, it brings git-worktree in line with the other > "checkout a branch" commands git-switch and git-checkout by teaching it > -d as shorthand for --detach (which those other commands already > understand). Hmph, "checkout" would not affect list of worktrees, but "worktree" could be used to delete an worktree, so I (or any other naive user like me) may mistake "-d" to mean "delete a worktree". But it is not "teach 'worktree' that -d is shorthand for --detach"; it is "teach 'worktree add' that -d is for --detach". And in that context, when adding a new worktree, there is no room for such a confusion to come into the picture. So I think it is just the way the series is marketted that triggered a potential negative reaction from me. > worktree: add -d short option for --detach
