Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hmm, I'm not sure how I feel about being able to override formats other > than "reference". Is the idea to introduce a parallel namespace to pretty.<name>? I am not sure why that is a good idea than, say a single variable that says "to me, pretty.<name> would override even the built-in names". I am not sure how I feel about being able to override built-in formats in the first place, though. After all, pretty.<name> were introduced so that user-defined ones can be invoked with an equal ease as the built-in ones, but overriding common understanding among the users of the tool is a different story.
