On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 14:28, Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 8/14/2020 8:21 AM, Martin Ågren wrote: > > - - 160-bit SHA-1 over the content of the index file before this > > + - 160-bit hash checksum over the content of the index file before this > > checksum. > > If this hash is flexible, then "160-bit" is not correct anymore, right? > > > - 160-bit SHA-1 for the represented object > > + 160-bit object name for the represented object > > Same here. The later instances of "160-bit" were dropped. Thanks for pointing out these errors. Martin
