On 2020-08-14 at 12:21:41, Martin Ågren wrote: > Hi brian, > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 00:49, brian m. carlson <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > As was pointed out recently, some of our documentation doesn't properly > > reflect the new support for SHA-256. This series updates the pack and > > index documentation to reflect that these formats can handle SHA-256, > > and updates the transition plan to reflect what we've implemented and > > what the next steps are. > > Thanks, this looks great. Now we're making clear what it is we intend to > be doing. > > What about these additional patches on top? These are based on my > understanding, but hopefully they're not *too* wrong. I'm a bit hesitant > about the final patch and it would be interesting to know what you > think. I think Stolee has a series so that the final patch isn't necessary, and other than the things he mentioned in this thread, I think these would be fine on top. -- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature