Re: [PATCH 0/5] more SHA-256 documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-08-14 at 12:21:41, Martin Ågren wrote:
> Hi brian,
> 
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 00:49, brian m. carlson <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > As was pointed out recently, some of our documentation doesn't properly
> > reflect the new support for SHA-256.  This series updates the pack and
> > index documentation to reflect that these formats can handle SHA-256,
> > and updates the transition plan to reflect what we've implemented and
> > what the next steps are.
> 
> Thanks, this looks great. Now we're making clear what it is we intend to
> be doing.
> 
> What about these additional patches on top? These are based on my
> understanding, but hopefully they're not *too* wrong. I'm a bit hesitant
> about the final patch and it would be interesting to know what you
> think.

I think Stolee has a series so that the final patch isn't necessary, and
other than the things he mentioned in this thread, I think these would
be fine on top.
-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux