Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Thanks. For the final version of this series, we should either queue > your patch or the one I just sent[0] just after the patch for t7107 so > that it comes before the we flip the switch on test_must_fail and also > so that the patches show up in increasing numerical order. Ah, our mails crossed. Surely the fix to cvs test must come before the final step that tightens the test_must_fail helper.
