On 04/07/2020 16:39, Đoàn Trần Công Danh wrote: > On 2020-07-04 20:51:04+0530, Shourya Shukla <shouryashukla.oo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 03/07 04:37, Philip Oakley wrote: >>> Suggestion... >>> >>> On 03/07/2020 15:57, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >>>> Maybe a native reader can suggest something that flows a bit easier? I am >>>> not a native English speaker, but I'd prefer something along those lines: >>>> >>>> Many `submodule--helper` subcommands follow the convention a >>> s/convention a/convention that a/ feels nicer for me >> I did not get this one. Are you asking to replace "convention" with "a" >> only? > He probably meant put "that" between "convention" and "a" > Pull ed/vi/sed out and that try this command on that line :) > > s/convention a/convention that a/ > > Correct. Philip
