On 03/07 04:37, Philip Oakley wrote: > > Suggestion... > > On 03/07/2020 15:57, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Maybe a native reader can suggest something that flows a bit easier? I am > > not a native English speaker, but I'd prefer something along those lines: > > > > Many `submodule--helper` subcommands follow the convention a > s/convention a/convention that a/ feels nicer for me I did not get this one. Are you asking to replace "convention" with "a" only? > > struct defines their callback data, and the declaration of said > s/said/that/ maybe. 'said' is a bit too much like 'patent speak', but > otherwise either word is OK. Okay will do! > > struct is followed immediately by a macro to use in static > > initializers, without any separating empty line. > > > > Let's align the `init`, `status` and `sync` subcommands with that > > convention. > Nice summary. > > Philip > Native Yorkshire speaker, but not that 'literate' ;-) This made me chuckle. Nice!
