Suggestion... On 03/07/2020 15:57, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Maybe a native reader can suggest something that flows a bit easier? I am > not a native English speaker, but I'd prefer something along those lines: > > Many `submodule--helper` subcommands follow the convention a s/convention a/convention that a/ feels nicer for me > struct defines their callback data, and the declaration of said s/said/that/ maybe. 'said' is a bit too much like 'patent speak', but otherwise either word is OK. > struct is followed immediately by a macro to use in static > initializers, without any separating empty line. > > Let's align the `init`, `status` and `sync` subcommands with that > convention. Nice summary. Philip Native Yorkshire speaker, but not that 'literate' ;-)
