Re: [PATCH] merge-strategies: Fix typo "reflected to"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dominic Jäger <dominic.jaeger@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> reflected to" does not exist (according to
> https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/reflect?q=reflected and
> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reflected)
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominic Jäger <dominic.jaeger@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> I only took a quick glance at the submitting patch guidelines.
> Feel free to quickly push this yourself if you want.
> Also, I'm not native, so I hope I looked this up correctly.

Thanks, looks good.  Will queue.

>
>  Documentation/merge-strategies.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
> b/Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
> index aa66cbe41e..2912de706b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ The 'recursive' strategy can take the following options:
>  ours;;
>         This option forces conflicting hunks to be auto-resolved cleanly by
>         favoring 'our' version.  Changes from the other tree that do not
> -       conflict with our side are reflected to the merge result.
> +       conflict with our side are reflected in the merge result.
>         For a binary file, the entire contents are taken from our side.
>  +
>  This should not be confused with the 'ours' merge strategy, which does not
> --
> 2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux