[PATCH] merge-strategies: Fix typo "reflected to"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



reflected to" does not exist (according to
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/reflect?q=reflected and
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reflected)

Signed-off-by: Dominic Jäger <dominic.jaeger@xxxxxxxxx>
---
I only took a quick glance at the submitting patch guidelines.
Feel free to quickly push this yourself if you want.
Also, I'm not native, so I hope I looked this up correctly.

 Documentation/merge-strategies.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
b/Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
index aa66cbe41e..2912de706b 100644
--- a/Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
+++ b/Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ The 'recursive' strategy can take the following options:
 ours;;
        This option forces conflicting hunks to be auto-resolved cleanly by
        favoring 'our' version.  Changes from the other tree that do not
-       conflict with our side are reflected to the merge result.
+       conflict with our side are reflected in the merge result.
        For a binary file, the entire contents are taken from our side.
 +
 This should not be confused with the 'ours' merge strategy, which does not
--
2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux