Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > To fix this issue, I would probably go about it by removing the "read" > subcommand and creating a "test-tool read-commit-graph" for the tests > that need that output. > > If others on-list think that the better thing to do is to update the > "read" subcommand to provide the same output, but iterate over each > layer of an incremental commit-graph, then I can do that work instead. I think moving it to test-tool is a good idea, whether the output presents a single result that consolidates all layers together, or allows to name just a single layer and shows its contents. I do not have a strong opinion between the two (both sounds usable debugging aid). Thanks.
