Re: [PATCH v2 20/23] .gitignore: touch up the entries regarding Visual Studio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 11:21:23PM +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> >>>>diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
> >>>>index e096e0a51c..e7bb15d301 100644
> >>>>--- a/.gitignore
> >>>>+++ b/.gitignore
> >>>>@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@
> >>>>  *.ipdb
> >>>>  *.dll
> >>>>  .vs/
> >>>>-/Debug/
> >>>>-/Release/
> >>>>+*.manifest
> >>>This new line ignores the tracked file 'compat/win32/git.manifest'
> >>>that was added fairly recently in fe90397604 (mingw: embed a manifest
> >>>to trick UAC into Doing The Right Thing, 2019-06-27).
> >>>
> >>>I wonder whether that's intentional or accidental.
> >>>
> >>>I'm inclined to think that it's merely accidental, because, as far as
> >>>I understand, this is an old-ish patch from times when there wasn't
> >>>any 'git.manifest' file in tree, and simply noone noticed that in the
> >>>meantime we got one.  But I have no idea about how a Git build with
> >>>Visual Studio is supposed to work, so it doesn't really matter what
> >>>I'm inclined to think :)
> >>>
> >>At the time, it was just one of the many non-source files that were
> >>generated by Visual Studio that cluttered the status list and also could
> >>accidentally added to the tracked files.
> >>
> >>The newly added .manifest file does appear to be there to 'trick' the
> >>Windows User Access Control (UAC) which otherwise can be an annoyance to
> >>'regular' users.
> >Sorry, I'm not sure how to interpret your reply, and can't decide
> >whether it tries to justify why that tracked file should be ignored,
> >or explains that ignoring it was accidental.
> >
> >Anyway, ignoring that tracked file apparently triggered a nested
> >worktree-related bug in 'git clean', which can lead to data loss:
> >
> >https://public-inbox.org/git/20190825185918.3909-1-szeder.dev@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> Basically manifests are a build artefact from Visual Studio [1], so it was
> just another file to be ignored, from a _source_ control control viewpoint.

I understand that manifest files, in general, are build artifacts.
But does Visual Studio overwrite the existing
'compat/win32/git.manifest' file in particular?  Yes or no? :)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux