Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> # Make sure that the file appears dirty, so checkout below has to >> # run the configured filter. >> test-tool chmtime =-10 .git/index && >> test-tool chmtime =+0 test.r && > > I think the comment is a good idea. I personally still prefer just > using 'touch' though, as I find it slightly easier to read (I had to > go look up what the =-/=+ in 'test-tool chmtime' does, while I knew > what touch would be doing :) Yup, I do not quite get why people feel 'touch' is a bad idea here. I also think we should discourage "test-tool chmtime =<anything>" (i.e. set to relative to the timestamp read from time(), as opposed to relative to the timestamp read from the filesystem), when we can avoid it, to allow tests on remote filesystem where the filesystem clock and the system clock may not always be in sync. > That said that's a minor preference for me, if people have a strong > opinion that test-tool chmtime is really better here I'm fine with > changing it.
