Am 22.08.19 um 19:49 schrieb Thomas Gummerer: > Right, the above is why I think 'touch' is a good idea here. Short of > system clocks jumping around, which will most likely break more than > this test anyway it guarantees that the timestamp is equal or greater > than the timestamp of the index, which is what we need here. Ok, thanks for the clarification. I didn't see the context. It looks like touch is good enough. -- Hannes
