Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > In a review[1] of my "many promisor remotes" patch series[2] and in > the following thread, it was suggested that a flag should be passed to > tell oid_object_info_extended() that it should not fetch objects from > promisor remotes if they are missing, instead of using the ugly > fetch_if_missing global. > > It looks like the OBJECT_INFO_FOR_PREFETCH flag already exists but > unfortunately conflates 2 separate things. > > This patch series introduces OBJECT_INFO_NO_FETCH_IF_MISSING to > disambiguate the different meanings and then uses it instead of > OBJECT_INFO_FOR_PREFETCH where it makes sense. > > 1: https://public-inbox.org/git/b4d69d2b-dc0d-fffb-2909-c54060fe9cd1@xxxxxxxxx/ > 2: https://public-inbox.org/git/20190409161116.30256-1-chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ What commit did you base these two patches on? > > Christian Couder (2): > object-store: introduce OBJECT_INFO_NO_FETCH_IF_MISSING > sha1-file: use OBJECT_INFO_NO_FETCH_IF_MISSING > > object-store.h | 9 +++++++-- > sha1-file.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
