On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:52 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > In a review[1] of my "many promisor remotes" patch series[2] and in > > the following thread, it was suggested that a flag should be passed to > > tell oid_object_info_extended() that it should not fetch objects from > > promisor remotes if they are missing, instead of using the ugly > > fetch_if_missing global. > > > > It looks like the OBJECT_INFO_FOR_PREFETCH flag already exists but > > unfortunately conflates 2 separate things. > > > > This patch series introduces OBJECT_INFO_NO_FETCH_IF_MISSING to > > disambiguate the different meanings and then uses it instead of > > OBJECT_INFO_FOR_PREFETCH where it makes sense. > > > > 1: https://public-inbox.org/git/b4d69d2b-dc0d-fffb-2909-c54060fe9cd1@xxxxxxxxx/ > > 2: https://public-inbox.org/git/20190409161116.30256-1-chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > What commit did you base these two patches on? They were based on master at v2.22.0 when I worked on them, but I didn't send them right away. And I didn't rebase them before I later sent them.
