Re: [PATCH 2/2] sha1-file: use OBJECT_INFO_NO_FETCH_IF_MISSING

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 2:39 PM Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/20/2019 4:50 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:30:26AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
>> >
>> >> Currently the OBJECT_INFO_FOR_PREFETCH flag is used to check
>> >> if we should fetch objects from promisor remotes when we
>> >> haven't found them elsewhere.
>> >>
>> >> Now that OBJECT_INFO_NO_FETCH_IF_MISSING exists, let's use
>> >> it instead to be more correct in case this new flag is ever
>> >> used without OBJECT_INFO_QUICK.
>> >
>> > I said earlier that this one would need to be tweaked for the new
>> > upstream name. But actually, I think it is not necessary after Stolee's
>> > patch.
>>
>> Yes, I believe that 31f5256c82  does an equivalent thing to the
>> combination of these patches.
>
> Yeah, I agree. Thanks Stolee for having already fixed that, and sorry
> for bothering everyone with this.

OK, I'll stop looking at this patch.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux