On Sun 2019-03-24 21:26:13 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> I don't personally have any use case for doing such a tag rename -- you
>> mention two:
>>
>> a) wanting to call tag "foo" that you found on remote "origin" by the
>> name of "origin/foo"
>>
>> b) wanting to call "v2.20.0" by the name "g2.20.0"
>
> For the record, in the latter there is no "wanting to call". It was
> merely a set-up used to illustrate what support there already exists
> in the current system that helps making users aware of tags that are
> not stored in there "natural" place.
>
> The former however is a natural consequence of noises people make
> around here from time to time, wanting to have tags you grab from
> elsewhere and tags you create locally in separate places.
Gotcha, thanks. I like the warnings that are already showing up from
(b) So I won't worry about (b) as a justification then, but rather keep
my focus on (a). (and i still think that (c) has better solutions than
tag renaming)
What do you think of my updated proposal for tag.verifyNameMatch ?
--dkg
