Hi git folks-- I understand that git tags can be easily renamed. for example: git tag push origin refs/tags/v0.0.3:refs/tags/v2.3.4 However, for tags signed with any recent version of git, the tag name is also included in the signed material: 0 dkg@test:~$ git tag -v v0.0.3 object 8ae6a246bef5b5eb0684e9fc1c933a4f8441dadd type commit tag v0.0.3 tagger Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 1528706225 +0200 this is my tag message gpg: Signature made Mon 11 Jun 2018 04:37:05 AM EDT gpg: using Ed25519 key C90E6D36200A1B922A1509E77618196529AE5FF8 gpg: Good signature from "Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" [ultimate] Primary key fingerprint: C4BC 2DDB 38CC E964 85EB E9C2 F206 9117 9038 E5C6 0 dkg@test:~$ But git tag doesn't verify that the internal name is the same as the external name (note that it still returns an exit code of zero): 0 dkg@test:~$ git tag -v v2.3.4 object 8ae6a246bef5b5eb0684e9fc1c933a4f8441dadd type commit tag v0.0.3 tagger Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 1528706225 +0200 this is my tag message gpg: Signature made Mon 11 Jun 2018 04:37:05 AM EDT gpg: using Ed25519 key C90E6D36200A1B922A1509E77618196529AE5FF8 gpg: Good signature from "Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" [ultimate] Primary key fingerprint: C4BC 2DDB 38CC E964 85EB E9C2 F206 9117 9038 E5C6 0 dkg@test:~$ This seems troublesome, as I expect there are many scripts that rely on the tag name and the return code of "git tag -v" to assert that this is a correct tag. Anyone in control of the above repository could pass off an old tag (or indeed, a tag from an entirely different project that happens to be signed by the same author) as whatever version they wanted to, and convince automated scripts that work with new versions to "upgrade". I think "git tag -v" should be more strict about what it needs to "pass" a verification. At a minimum, if the internal tag name (the line matching "^tag " before the first blank line) doesn't match the tag name being verified, "git tag -v" should report a warning to stderr and return a non-zero error code. What do you think? i'm not subscribed to git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, so please keep me in Cc on this thread, thanks! --dkg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature