Re: git tag -v should verify that the tag signer intended the same tag name as the user is verifying

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I don't personally have any use case for doing such a tag rename -- you
> mention two:
>
>  a) wanting to call tag "foo" that you found on remote "origin" by the
>     name of "origin/foo"
>
>  b) wanting to call "v2.20.0" by the name "g2.20.0"

For the record, in the latter there is no "wanting to call".  It was
merely a set-up used to illustrate what support there already exists
in the current system that helps making users aware of tags that are
not stored in there "natural" place.

The former however is a natural consequence of noises people make
around here from time to time, wanting to have tags you grab from
elsewhere and tags you create locally in separate places.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux