Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:49:22AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > infrequent contributors. And there are a few reasons to prefer GGG: >> > >> > 1. submitGit seems to still have a few rough edges. E.g., it doesn't >> > munge timestamps to help threaded mail readers handled out-of-order >> > delivery. >> >> Hmph, I had an impression that the recent "why aren't these sorted" >> topics were via GGG, not submitGit, though. > > We did have one case a few months ago, but I think it was since fixed. > > Whereas it cannot be fixed for submitGit without major re-architecting, > because the mails go out through Amazon SES, which writes its own > timestamp. > > I could be wrong about GGG being fixed though. I haven't noticed the > problem lately, but we definitely had a submitGit-related one a few > weeks ago. Yeah, I was confused; <xmqqtvgk4urv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> was about submitGit, but somehow I thought the sender switched to, and the out-of-order thread was sent via, GGG. My mistake.
