Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > infrequent contributors. And there are a few reasons to prefer GGG: > > 1. submitGit seems to still have a few rough edges. E.g., it doesn't > munge timestamps to help threaded mail readers handled out-of-order > delivery. Hmph, I had an impression that the recent "why aren't these sorted" topics were via GGG, not submitGit, though. > 2. Subjectively, GGG seems to be more commonly used on the list these > days, especially by list regulars. > > 3. GGG seems to be under more active development (likely related to > point 2). > > So let's actually swap out submitGit for GGG. While we're there, let's > put another link to the GGG page in the PR template, because that's > where users who are learning about it for the first time will want to go > to read more. Yeah, I see Roberto agrees with the direction, and I do too. Thanks, Roberto for submitGit that served us well, Dscho for GGG that will serve us better, and Peff for updating this ;-)
