On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:49:22AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > infrequent contributors. And there are a few reasons to prefer GGG: > > > > 1. submitGit seems to still have a few rough edges. E.g., it doesn't > > munge timestamps to help threaded mail readers handled out-of-order > > delivery. > > Hmph, I had an impression that the recent "why aren't these sorted" > topics were via GGG, not submitGit, though. We did have one case a few months ago, but I think it was since fixed. Whereas it cannot be fixed for submitGit without major re-architecting, because the mails go out through Amazon SES, which writes its own timestamp. I could be wrong about GGG being fixed though. I haven't noticed the problem lately, but we definitely had a submitGit-related one a few weeks ago. -Peff
