Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Use size_t instead of 'unsigned long' for data in memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 19.01.2019 um 18:06 schrieb Torsten Bögershausen:
> On 16.01.19 22:46, Thomas Braun wrote:
>> Am 20.11.2018 um 06:04 schrieb tboegi@xxxxxx:
>>
>> I'm interested in helping getting this forward!
>>
>>> What we really need for this patch to fly are this branches:
>>> mk/use-size-t-in-zlib
>>
>> In pu.
> 
> Junio, is that branch ready for master ?
> 
>>
>>> tb/print-size-t-with-uintmax-format
>>
>> in master.
>>
>>> And then it is rebased on top of all cooking stuff, too many branches
>>> to be mentioned here.
>>>
>>> It may be usefull to examine all "unsigned long" which are left after
>>> this patch and turn them into (what ? unsigned int? size_t? uint32_t ?).
>>> And once they are settled, re-do this patch with help of a coccinelle script.
>>> I don't know.
>>> I probably will rebase it until Junio says stop or someone else comes with
>>> a better solution.
>>
>> I could not spot this series in the cooking list so what is good way
>> forward?
>>
> 
> That patch never made it anywhere (yet)
> The last update on master, which I did so far, is here:
> <https://github.com/tboegi/git/pull/new/tb.190104_0635_convert_size_t_only_git_master_181124_mk_size_t>
> 
> Do you want to continue ?
> 

Yeah I'll give it a shot in the near future.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux