Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Use size_t instead of 'unsigned long' for data in memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 20.11.2018 um 06:04 schrieb tboegi@xxxxxx:

I'm interested in helping getting this forward!

> What we really need for this patch to fly are this branches:
> mk/use-size-t-in-zlib

In pu.

> tb/print-size-t-with-uintmax-format

in master.

> And then it is rebased on top of all cooking stuff, too many branches
> to be mentioned here.
> 
> It may be usefull to examine all "unsigned long" which are left after
> this patch and turn them into (what ? unsigned int? size_t? uint32_t ?).
> And once they are settled, re-do this patch with help of a coccinelle script.
> I don't know.
> I probably will rebase it until Junio says stop or someone else comes with
> a better solution.

I could not spot this series in the cooking list so what is good way
forward?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux