Am 20.11.2018 um 06:04 schrieb tboegi@xxxxxx: I'm interested in helping getting this forward! > What we really need for this patch to fly are this branches: > mk/use-size-t-in-zlib In pu. > tb/print-size-t-with-uintmax-format in master. > And then it is rebased on top of all cooking stuff, too many branches > to be mentioned here. > > It may be usefull to examine all "unsigned long" which are left after > this patch and turn them into (what ? unsigned int? size_t? uint32_t ?). > And once they are settled, re-do this patch with help of a coccinelle script. > I don't know. > I probably will rebase it until Junio says stop or someone else comes with > a better solution. I could not spot this series in the cooking list so what is good way forward?