Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Use size_t instead of 'unsigned long' for data in memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16.01.19 22:46, Thomas Braun wrote:
> Am 20.11.2018 um 06:04 schrieb tboegi@xxxxxx:
>
> I'm interested in helping getting this forward!
>
>> What we really need for this patch to fly are this branches:
>> mk/use-size-t-in-zlib
>
> In pu.

Junio, is that branch ready for master ?

>
>> tb/print-size-t-with-uintmax-format
>
> in master.
>
>> And then it is rebased on top of all cooking stuff, too many branches
>> to be mentioned here.
>>
>> It may be usefull to examine all "unsigned long" which are left after
>> this patch and turn them into (what ? unsigned int? size_t? uint32_t ?).
>> And once they are settled, re-do this patch with help of a coccinelle script.
>> I don't know.
>> I probably will rebase it until Junio says stop or someone else comes with
>> a better solution.
>
> I could not spot this series in the cooking list so what is good way
> forward?
>

That patch never made it anywhere (yet)
The last update on master, which I did so far, is here:
<https://github.com/tboegi/git/pull/new/tb.190104_0635_convert_size_t_only_git_master_181124_mk_size_t>

Do you want to continue ?






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux