On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 10:52:19AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> Yeah, they should. I think one of them will need René's patch, which > >> changes the body of quick_has_loose(). I can roll it as a separate topic > >> if that's easier (or just wait a week or so until René's cleanups > >> graduate). > > > > Nah, what I got is already good to work with. Both series are > > straight-forward and I do not expect them needing long fermentation. > > Yikes, the conflicts with sb/more-repo-in-api is quite irritating. > I think I'll postpone the later parts of this series and ask this to > be sent after sb/more-repo-in-api matures a bit mroe. There were several conflicts, but it was mostly just tedious textual fixups. I pushed the result to: https://github.com/peff/git.git resolve-oid-more-repo But I'm happy to wait and rebase if sb/more-repo-in-api is close to graduating. -Peff
