Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Yeah, they should. I think one of them will need René's patch, which >> changes the body of quick_has_loose(). I can roll it as a separate topic >> if that's easier (or just wait a week or so until René's cleanups >> graduate). > > Nah, what I got is already good to work with. Both series are > straight-forward and I do not expect them needing long fermentation. Yikes, the conflicts with sb/more-repo-in-api is quite irritating. I think I'll postpone the later parts of this series and ask this to be sent after sb/more-repo-in-api matures a bit mroe.
