Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Oct 10 2018, Jeff King wrote: > >> This is much better, and I love the customized behavior based on the >> object type. >> >> I wonder if we could reword the first paragraph to be a little less >> confusing, and spell out what we tried already. E.g., something like: >> ... > > Yeah that makes sense. I was trying to avoid touching the existing > wording to make this more surgical, but you came up with it, and since > you don't like it I'll just change that too. OK, for now I'll mark these two patches "read" in my inbox and forget about them, expecting that a reroll of 2/2 with improved messages would appear not in too distant future. Thanks, both.
