Re: [PATCH 2/2] Check for IO errors after running a command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> I took the liberty of munging your two patches to follow your comments 
> above (it was a perfect guinea-pig opportunity for Johannes's "rebase 
> -i").

And? How was that experience?

I am actually quite pleased how it worked out in the end; I never 
understood the syntax of rebase, and stayed away from it for that reason. 
By reworking patch-series into rebase -i, I learnt it on the way, and find 
it actually quite useful.

One thing we might consider, however: when rebasing, the current branch 
gets updated at each step. Some might consider this a bug, and prefer 
rebase to work on a detached HEAD, and only update the branch at the end, 
so that <branchname>@{1} refers to the state _before_ rebase.

Thoughts?

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux