"Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> author is important to our process. My objective is to keep the original file >> 100% exact as supplied and then ignore any changes to the metadata that I >> don't care about (like Creator) if the remainder of the file is the same. That will *not* work. If person A gave you a version of original, which hashes to X after you strip the cruft you do not care about, you would register that original with person A's fingerprint on under the name of X. What happens when person B gives you another version, which is not byte-for-byte identical to the one you got earlier from person A, but does hash to the same X after you strip the cruft? If you are going to store it in Git, and if by SHA-1 you are calling what we perceive as "object name" in Git land, you must store that one with person B's fingerprint on it also under the name of X. Now which version will you get from Git when you ask it to give you the object that hashes to X?
