On September 12, 2018 4:54 PM, I wrote: > On September 12, 2018 4:48 PM, Johannes Sixt wrote: > > Am 12.09.18 um 21:16 schrieb Randall S. Becker: > > > I feel really bad asking this, and I should know the answer, and yet. > > > > > > I have a binary file that needs to go into a repo intact (unchanged). > > > I also have a program that interprets the contents, like a textconv, > > > that can output the relevant portions of the file in whatever format > > > I like - used for diff typically, dumps in 1K chunks by file section. > > > What I'm looking for is to have the SHA1 signature calculated with > > > just the relevant portions of the file so that two actually > > > different files will be considered the same by git during a commit > > > or status. In real terms, I'm trying to ignore the Creator metadata > > > of a JPG because it is mutable and irrelevant to my repo contents. > > > > > > I'm sorry to ask, but I thought this was in .gitattributes but I > > > can't confirm the SHA1 behaviour. > > > > You are looking for a clean filter. See the 'filter' attribute in gitattributes(5). > > Your clean filter program or script should strip the unwanted metadata > > or set it to a constant known-good value. > > > > (You shouldn't need a smudge filter.) > > > > -- Hannes > > Thanks Hannes. I thought about the clean filter, but I don't actually want to > modify the file when going into git, just for SHA calculation. I need to be able > to keep some origin metadata that might change with subsequent copies, so > just cleaning the origin is not going to work - actually knowing the original > author is important to our process. My objective is to keep the original file > 100% exact as supplied and then ignore any changes to the metadata that I > don't care about (like Creator) if the remainder of the file is the same. I had a thought that might be workable, opinions are welcome on this. The commit of my rather weird project is done by a script so I have flexibility in my approach. What I could do is set up a diff textconv configuration so that the text diff of the two JPG files will show no differences if the immutable fields and the image are the same. I can then trigger a git add and git commit for only those files where git diff reports no differences. That way the actual original file is stored in git with 100% fidelity (no cleaning). It's not as elegant as I'd like, but it does solve what I'm trying to do. Does this sound reasonable and/or is there a better way? Cheers, Randall -- Brief whoami: NonStop developer since approximately 211288444200000000 UNIX developer since approximately 421664400 -- In my real life, I talk too much.
