Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>> struct strs {...};
>>
>> void strs_init(struct strs *);
>> void strs_push(struct strs *, const char *);
>> void strs_pushf(struct strs *, const char *fmt, ...);
>> void strs_pushl(struct strs *, ...);
>> void strs_pushv(struct strs *, const char **);
>> void strs_pop(struct strs *);
>> void strs_clear(struct strs *);
>> const char **strs_detach(struct strs *);
>>
>> ...is short, feels pretty natural, and doesn't require understanding
>> "v" for "vector".
>
> Not bad. The "v" carries the information that it _is_ a NULL-terminated
> vector and not some other list-like structure (and so is suitable for
> feeding to execv, etc). But that may just be obvious from looking at its
> uses and documentation.
And with "v", it probably is obvious without looking at its uses and
documentation, so... ;-)
