On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 01:58:00PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> So are we looking for a natural name to call an array of trings? I
>> personally do not mind argv_array too much, but perhaps we can call
>> it a string_array and then everybody will be happy?
>
> That would be fine with me. Though I would love it if we could find a
> shorter name for the associated functions. For example,
> argv_array_pushf() can make lines quite long, and something like
> argv_pushf() is easier to read (in my opinion). And that might work
> because "argv" is pretty unique by itself, but "string" is not.
>
> Some one-word name like "strarray" might work, though I find that is not
> quite catchy. I guess "strv" is short if you assume that people know the
> "v" suffix means "vector".
struct strs {...};
void strs_init(struct strs *);
void strs_push(struct strs *, const char *);
void strs_pushf(struct strs *, const char *fmt, ...);
void strs_pushl(struct strs *, ...);
void strs_pushv(struct strs *, const char **);
void strs_pop(struct strs *);
void strs_clear(struct strs *);
const char **strs_detach(struct strs *);
...is short, feels pretty natural, and doesn't require understanding
"v" for "vector".
