On 27/02/2018 20:59, Igor Djordjevic wrote: > > (3) ---X1---o---o---o---o---o---X2 > |\ |\ > | A1---A2---A3---U1 | A1'--A2'--A3'--U1' > | \ | > | M | > | / | > \-B1---B2---B3---U2 \-B1'--B2'--B3'--U2' > Meh, I hope I`m rushing it now, but for example, if we had decided to drop commit A2 during an interactive rebase (so losing A2' from diagram above), wouldn`t U2' still introduce those changes back, once U1' and U2' are merged, being incorrect/unwanted behavior...? :/ p.s. Looks like Johannes already elaborated on this in the meantime, let`s see... (goes reading that other e-mail[1]) [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1802272330290.56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
