Re: [PATCH 2/2] ref-filter: get rid of goto

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Olga Telezhnaya <olyatelezhnaya@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Get rid of goto command in ref-filter for better readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olga Telezhnaia <olyatelezhnaya@xxxxxxxxx>
> Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Mentored by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  ref-filter.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

It looks like this is the same change as the bottom-most change on
your "cat-file --batch" series (and is obviously correct).

I am puzzled by your intention---are you re-organizing and rebooting
the series?  Either 'Yes' or 'No' is an acceptable answer, and so is
anything else.  I just want to know what you want to happen to the
merge conflicts if I queued this while still keeping your "cat-file
--batch" thing I have on 'pu').

>
> diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
> index 83ffd84affe52..28df6e21fb996 100644
> --- a/ref-filter.c
> +++ b/ref-filter.c
> @@ -1494,11 +1494,11 @@ static void populate_value(struct ref_array_item *ref)
>  	for (i = 0; i < used_atom_cnt; i++) {
>  		struct atom_value *v = &ref->value[i];
>  		if (v->s == NULL)
> -			goto need_obj;
> +			break;
>  	}
> -	return;
> +	if (used_atom_cnt <= i)
> +		return;
>  
> - need_obj:
>  	get_object(ref, &ref->objectname, 0, &obj);
>  
>  	/*
>
> --
> https://github.com/git/git/pull/460



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux