Re: [PATCH 0/6] minor test-hashmap fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:41:35AM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote:

> I have lost track of the hashmap improvements lately, but with
> such a good test helper, we could reduce the amount of
> commented code in hashmap.h and just link to the test helper?
> (as an extra step after this series, I thought we already had that)

Yeah, the example code in hashmap.h looks to be more or less the same
thing as what's here (it maps a long to a value, which simplifies the
FLEX_ARRAY bits, but I think it serves equally well as a reference).

I'd also be fine with drastically simplifying the example in hashmap.h,
and letting test-hashmap serve as a more fleshed-out example (we don't
need to see the main and scanf bits there).

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux