Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Yup, this is about giving summary in a compact way, not about giving >> a compact stat information. I agree with all the above reasoning, >> and that is why I said that your "compact-summary" was a good way to >> refer to the feature. > > OK I'll wait for a few days. If there's no comment, I'll go with > --stat=compact-summary. Sorry, but that is not what I agreed with you on ;-) I meant to say that your earlier --compact-summary made sense. I do not think "compact summary" as a value of "--stat" makes any sense. It's not like this new one is one of the ways we offer to present "stat" differently and compared to other existing ways this is to give the stat in a compactly summarized fashion. If this were a value to "--summary", then "--summary=in-stat" might make sense, in that this is not about how we show the "stat" information but about how/where "summary" information is shown.
