On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:56 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I actually think compact-summary was a good way to phrase it. >> >> Personally, I think it was a UI mistake that --summary can be given >> independently with or without --stat (instead, there shouldn't have >> been the --summary option, and instead when it was added, --stat >> just should have gained an extra kind of output). A single option >> that can give both kinds of info may be a good way forward, so >> another possibility may be --summary-in-stat (meaning: the info >> given by summary is included in stat output). I dunno. > > +Eric maybe he has some idea (sorry I forgot to include people from > the last round). What about the earlier suggestion[1] (and minor follow-ups[2,3]) of making this another option to --stat= (for instance, --stat=compact)? Did that idea get shot down or am I misunderstanding the question here. [1]: https://public-inbox.org/git/CAPig+cQLgs59JYxcmK30qY307ArwqJx6pNOo95Z39_jJ9+D6+g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [2]: https://public-inbox.org/git/CACsJy8B5qrN8T1aai3y3nfEc5baqn2Xkk6vZozMp5Lh-mPZ0VQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [3]: https://public-inbox.org/git/CACsJy8CPHk+aXHr-mkHZi27s=c3+ny8D9CSuzOSO8PweviBcqQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
