Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > ... > Then we still need to decide the new keyword for this feature, I feel > compact is a bit too vague (I read --stat=compact as "it's compact > stat", not "stat with compact summary"), so perhaps > --stat=compact-summary, or just --stat=summary? Yup, this is about giving summary in a compact way, not about giving a compact stat information. I agree with all the above reasoning, and that is why I said that your "compact-summary" was a good way to refer to the feature.
