Re: [PATCH 04/28] packed_ref_store: move `packed_refs_lock` member here

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I chose that name because it is a `ref_store`, with `packed_` being a
> short prefix that tells what kind of `ref_store`.
>
> The next question is, why `ref_store` as opposed to `refs_store`? To me
> it sounds more natural in English for the reasons that you mentioned.

Yeah after some thought on language this sounds good to me, too.
I still have to work on natural. ;)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]