That behavior is now documented, and we don't
need a reward afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Krey <a.krey@xxxxxx>
---
> Sorry for making you send an extra round; let's queue the original,
> and if you still are interested, have the "Clever" removal as its
> own patch.
Here you go.
builtin/commit.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/commit.c b/builtin/commit.c
index 89b66816f..276c74034 100644
--- a/builtin/commit.c
+++ b/builtin/commit.c
@@ -1208,8 +1208,6 @@ static int parse_and_validate_options(int argc, const char *argv[],
die(_("Only one of --include/--only/--all/--interactive/--patch can be used."));
if (argc == 0 && (also || (only && !amend && !allow_empty)))
die(_("No paths with --include/--only does not make sense."));
- if (argc == 0 && only && amend)
- only_include_assumed = _("Clever... amending the last one with dirty index.");
if (argc > 0 && !also && !only)
only_include_assumed = _("Explicit paths specified without -i or -o; assuming --only paths...");
if (!cleanup_arg || !strcmp(cleanup_arg, "default"))
--
2.11.0.10.g1e1b186.dirty