Andreas Krey <a.krey@xxxxxx> writes: > Ok, I've removed the clever message, as Junio suggested. > I don't know what else to do to make it acceptable. :-) > We're going to deploy it internally anyway, but I think > it belongs in git.git as well (aka 'Can I has "will queue"?'). Oh, sorry for being unclear. Before I started saying "Slightly related topic.", after quoting "The patch itself looks good to me." by Peff, I meant to say "Yeah, this looks good; thanks.", but apparently I forgot. Removal of "Clever" is a separate issue and it may make sense to do so, but it deserves its own commit with its own justification. Sorry for making you send an extra round; let's queue the original, and if you still are interested, have the "Clever" removal as its own patch. Thanks.