On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:28:40AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > OK, here is what I'll queue then. > I assumed that René wants to sign it off ;-). > > -- >8 -- > From: René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> > Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:57:30 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] hex: make wraparound of the index into ring-buffer explicit > > Overflow is defined for unsigned integers, but not for signed ones. > > We could make the ring-buffer index in sha1_to_hex() and > get_pathname() unsigned to be on the safe side to resolve this, but > let's make it explicit that we are wrapping around at whatever the > number of elements the ring-buffer has. The compiler is smart enough > to turn modulus into bitmask for these codepaths that use > ring-buffers of a size that is a power of 2. Looks good to me. > diff --git a/path.c b/path.c > index fe3c4d96c6..9bfaeda207 100644 > --- a/path.c > +++ b/path.c > @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ static struct strbuf *get_pathname(void) > STRBUF_INIT, STRBUF_INIT, STRBUF_INIT, STRBUF_INIT > }; > static int index; > - struct strbuf *sb = &pathname_array[3 & ++index]; > + struct strbuf *sb = &pathname_array[index]; > + index = (index + 1) % ARRAY_SIZE(pathname_array); > strbuf_reset(sb); > return sb; This converts the pre-increment to a post-increment, but I don't think it matters. -Peff